patriotsnetwork.com I Guarantee Ron Paul Could Beat Obama Hands Down
Follow Me on Twitter!
- The Wrap: From Ron Paul's call to end the IRS, to the London machete attack ... - Washington Times
- John Berryhill Says UDRP Panel Got It Right On Ron Paul's Domains - TheDomains.com
- Ron Paul Isn't Getting RonPaul.com - Mashable
- Ron Paul Loses Attempt to Claim RonPaul.com and RonPaul.org Domain Names - Reason (blog)
- Michelle Malkin Versus Ron Paul - Wealth Daily
- Check Out Sexy Ron Paul Being Don Draper On a Bicycle - Gawker
- Ron Paul: Government Lying About Inflation - FITSNews
- Ron Paul: Fix IRS by shutting it 'once and for all' - Washington Times
- EXCLUSIVE: Ron Paul's revolution continues (interview) - Washington Times
- Ron Paul: Benghazi a result of US 'interventionism' - Washington Times
#1 by SpazzzDog on November 20, 2010 - 2:12 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz Bush handled it horribly! He was on vacation in August when his administration was forewarned of an impending attack. He took no action to raise alertness and implement security measures. We were told an attack was very likely and he did NOTHING and we were totally blind sided. Thousands of people died needlessly because of his incompetence. If he responded to the warnings lives could of been saved.
#2 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 2:42 pm
Quote
@SpazzzDog Bush made the troops go in Afhganistan, 9/11 happened due to lack of security at airport and he had plans to be the education president, George Bush did something to prevent it from happening again and so far it has worked, Bush handled it well.
#3 by SpazzzDog on November 20, 2010 - 3:36 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz Bush did nothing until 9/12. He had over half a year to act since inauguration. He was given fair warning by intelligence in August 2001. Bush failed and let 9/11 happen out of incompetence.
#4 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 4:05 pm
Quote
@SpazzzDog it happened before Bush enacted tough foreign policy and Clinton left the airports unsecured.
#5 by SpazzzDog on November 20, 2010 - 4:21 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz You think intelligence might have something to do with it? Correlation proves nothing. 9/11 happened on Bush’s watch.
#6 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 4:55 pm
Quote
@SpazzzDog yes it does, that is why another 9/11 hasn’t happened since.
#7 by SpazzzDog on November 20, 2010 - 5:48 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz That doesn’t work
#8 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 6:25 pm
Quote
@SpazzzDog our protection depends on a tough approach so we invoke fear with in the enemy.
#9 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 6:58 pm
Quote
@jlbarber54 that is the democrats forieng policy specifically obamas
#10 by SpazzzDog on November 20, 2010 - 7:10 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz Our protection depends upon a softer approach to foreign affairs. Bush and McCain’s aggressive policies only digs the whole deeper.
#11 by poopstreek on November 20, 2010 - 7:53 pm
Quote
I would love for Ron Paul to debate Obama.
#12 by manmanguy on November 20, 2010 - 7:55 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz If you’d rather sacrifice your rights for safety you deserve neither.
#13 by jlbarber54 on November 20, 2010 - 8:54 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz NO… Your foreign policy of sticking our nose in everyone’s business jeopardizes our national security. The fact that we support and protect dictators in the Arab world (Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, Egypt and the rest) with our military jeopardizes our national security. Your ideal of foreign policy is the stuff that give bin Laden his appeal in the Muslim world. The CIA calls it blowback.
#14 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 9:31 pm
Quote
@manmanguy its worth it its better than a muslim blowing up a plane and the 90 percent of muslims vote democrat and left wing.
#15 by manmanguy on November 20, 2010 - 9:55 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz Wow, that’s one of the dumbest things I’ve heard in a while. 1. Those Muslims who support terrorism are WAY more conservative than any American conservative. 2. I’ve never said I support terrorism. 3. If you feel it’s a good idea to give up your rights to and depend on the federal govt’ THAT is a core liberal policy.
#16 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 10:07 pm
Quote
@manmanguy no your not, if you support terrorists your a liberal
#17 by manmanguy on November 20, 2010 - 10:19 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz Shit I’m more conservative than you cocksucker.
#18 by JBBlitz on November 20, 2010 - 11:08 pm
Quote
@SpazzzDog actually his foreign policy jeopardize United States national security.
#19 by SpazzzDog on November 20, 2010 - 11:50 pm
Quote
@JBBlitz That’s a compliment, Obama’s foreign policy is exemplary.
#20 by SpazzzDog on November 21, 2010 - 12:04 am
Quote
Adam Smith, the founding father of capitalism, believed in taxing the rich and spreading the wealth. He knew a concentration of wealth at the top was bad for any Nation.
#21 by JBBlitz on November 21, 2010 - 1:03 am
Quote
@manmanguy i smell a liberal bitch
#22 by JBBlitz on November 21, 2010 - 1:09 am
Quote
@kungfujones1 your a terrorist supporting anti american scumbag.
#23 by manmanguy on November 21, 2010 - 1:54 am
Quote
@JBBlitz I smell a lonely neocon.
#24 by kungfujones1 on November 21, 2010 - 2:39 am
Quote
@JBBlitz You’re a loud obnoxious jerkoff. Nobody watches you’re idiotic videos. All of your re hatched neocon BS talking points have been ridiculed into total irrelevancy. If Ron Paul sucks terrorist’s dick, your sir, have Bill O’reilly’s dick up your ass while jerking off both Bill Kristol and Dick Cheny.
And BTW asshole, 911 was an inside job.
#25 by Plutarch1964 on November 21, 2010 - 2:57 am
Quote
ron is great!! We should be ashamed of putting up with anymore pc SHIT